L-Mix: A Latent-Level Instance Mixup Regularization for Robust Self-Supervised Speaker Representation Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the recent years, various self-supervised embedding learning methods for deep speaker verification were proposed. The performance of the self-supervised learning framework highly depends on the data augmentation technique, but due to the sensitive nature of speaker information within the speech signal, most speaker embedding training relies on simple augmentations such as additive noise or simulated reverberation. Thus while the conventional self-supervised speaker embedding systems can yield minimum within-utterance variability, their capability to generalize to out-of-set utterance is limited. In order to alleviate this problem, we investigate the utilization of the instance mix (i-mix) regularization for training a self-supervised speaker embedding system. Moreover, we propose a new mixup strategy that applies i-mix on the latent space, instead of the raw acoustic feature domain. In this paper, the i-mix and the proposed l-mix strategy were incorporated into the self-supervised angular prototypical and softmax-based objective functions and were evaluated on the VoxCeleb dataset. From the experimental results, we observe that the self-supervised embedding network can benefit greatly from the i-mix and l-mix strategies in terms of training stability and speaker verification performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it