MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Input-Layer Neuron Implementation Using Delta-Sigma Modulators

2022· article· en· W4289926190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 20th IEEE Interregional NEWCAS Conference (NEWCAS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpiking neural networkArtificial neural networkElectronic circuitSpike (software development)SynapseBiological neural networkBiological neuron modelEncoding (memory)Topology (electrical circuits)Artificial intelligenceNeuroscienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), typical spiking neuron models use currents as inputs. In turn, synaptic circuits generate current pulses from the neural voltage spikes. In a neural network, the first layer serves as an interface between the external world and the remainder of the network. In this paper, we propose the use of the well-known ∆Σ encoding scheme as the basis in the design of two input-layer neuron circuits. Their purpose is to convert analog sensor voltages into spike trains with firing rates that are linearly proportional to the input voltage. We use simple available circuits: a 1 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">st</sup> -order ∆Σ modulator, D-flipflops, a differential-pair synapse, and an Integrate-and-Fire (IF) neuron. These input-layer neurons can be implemented on the same IC as the rest of the SNN, and are capable of encoding values over a wide range of inputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it