MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4290635145 · doi:10.3171/case22269

Non-contrast–enhancing subdural empyema: illustrative case

2022· article· en· W4290635145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Case Lessons · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSinusitis and nasal conditions
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCraniotomySubdural empyemaEmpyemaContrast (vision)Computed tomographyContrast enhancementRadiologySurgeryMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Subdural empyema (SDE) is a life-threatening intracranial infection that, without timely surgical intervention and appropriate antibiotic treatment, is inevitably fatal. SDE is classically recognized on brain imaging as a subdural collection surrounded by a contrast-enhancing ring. OBSERVATIONS: The authors describe the case of a 41-year-old male with clinical features consistent with SDE but without any contrast enhancement on multiple computed tomography scans obtained more than 48 hours apart. Given the high clinical suspicion for SDE, a craniotomy was performed that demonstrated frank pus that eventually grew Streptococcus pyogenes. LESSONS: This case demonstrates that SDE may present without ring enhancement on contrast-enhanced imaging. In critically ill patients with a high clinical suspicion for SDE despite lack of contrast enhancement, we demonstrate that exploratory burr holes or craniotomy can provide diagnostic confirmation and source control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it