Strategies for Parent Involvement During Distance Learning in Arabic Lessons in Elementary Schools
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to find various obstacles, describe, and provide strategies for parents when accompanying and providing direction to their children in distance learning. The method used in this research is the interview method. Interview, observation, listening, and note-taking techniques are data collection techniques used. The results of this study indicate that there are barriers for parents in distance learning. Among them are difficult internet signals, expensive internet quotas, and parents who are not able to fully guide and understand the material, so you have to ask your friends directly. The role of parents is very conducive to the academic success of a child. Always encourage and have innovations in child supervision so that children do not feel bored or even stressed in learning. There needs to be smooth coordination between parents and teachers. This assessment is needed to improve student learning outcomes. In the application of the home learning system, parents play an important role in the student learning process in the distance learning process at home today.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it