An inverse data envelopment analysis model to consider ratio data and preferences of decision-makers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inverse data envelopment analysis (DEA) determines the optimal level of inputs and/or outputs of decision-making units (DMUs) to reach efficiency targets. This paper presents a new inverse DEA model for determining minimum inputs for working capital management. The proposed model is employed in the Indian textile industry to calculate working capital efficiency. Given the working capital efficiency, the decision maker’s preferences will be estimating the change in inputs when outputs increase. Furthermore, unlike the standard inverse DEA model, this article discusses the inverse DEA model when negative ratio data exist. The DEA model requires additional attention when ratio data are present; therefore, a novel inverse DEA ratio model is proposed. The input targets obtained from the proposed model are less than the standard inverse DEA model. Also, the proposed model is a closer estimate of the production probability set for ratio data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it