MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292371286 · doi:10.1111/pcn.13463

Gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in the midcingulate cortex and clozapine response in patients with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia: A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (<sup>1</sup>H‐MRS) study

2022· article· en· W4292371286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMental Health Research CanadaUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Mental Health FoundationNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
KeywordsClozapineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)gamma-Aminobutyric acidGABAergicInternal medicineMedicinePsychologyPathophysiologyEndocrinologyPsychiatryNeuroscienceInhibitory postsynaptic potentialReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Gamma‐Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. GABAergic dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Clozapine, the only approved drug for treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (TRS), involves the GABAergic system as one of its targets. However, no studies have investigated the relationship between brain GABA levels, as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 H‐MRS), and clozapine response in patients with TRS. Methods This study enrolled patients with TRS who did not respond to clozapine (ultra‐resistant schizophrenia: URS) and who responded to clozapine (non‐URS), patients with schizophrenia who responded to first‐line antipsychotics (first‐line responders: FLR), and healthy controls (HCs). We measured GABA levels in the midcingulate cortex (MCC) using 3T 1 H‐MRS and compared these levels among the groups. The associations between GABA levels and symptom severity were also explored within the patient groups. Results A total of 98 participants (URS: n = 22; non‐URS: n = 25; FLR: n = 16; HCs: n = 35) completed the study. We found overall group differences in MCC GABA levels ( F (3,86) = 3.25, P = 0.04). Specifically, patients with URS showed higher GABA levels compared to those with non‐URS ( F (1,52) = 8.40, P = 0.03, Cohen's d = 0.84). MCC GABA levels showed no associations with any of the symptom severity scores within each group or the entire patient group. Conclusion Our study is the first to report elevated GABA levels in the MCC in patients with schizophrenia resistant to clozapine treatment compared with those responsive to clozapine. Longitudinal studies are required to evaluate if GABA levels are a suitable biomarker to predict clozapine resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it