MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292707342 · doi:10.1017/prm.2022.56

On some nonlinear Schrödinger equations in ℝ<sup><i>N</i></sup>

2022· article· en· W4292707342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSobolev spaceUniquenessExponentSchrödinger equationLambdaMathematical physicsPhysicsCritical exponentConjectureMathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsPhase transition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the following nonlinear Schrödinger equations with the critical Sobolev exponent and mixed nonlinearities: \[\left\{\begin{aligned} &amp; -\Delta u+\lambda u=t|u|^{q-2}u+|u|^{2^{*}-2}u\quad\text{in }\mathbb{R}^{N},\\ &amp; u\in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{N}), \end{aligned}\right.\] where $N\geq 3$ , $t&gt;0$ , $\lambda &gt;0$ and $2&lt; q&lt;2^{*}=\frac {2N}{N-2}$ . Based on our recent study on the normalized solutions of the above equation in [J. Wei and Y. Wu, Normalized solutions for Schrodinger equations with critical Sobolev exponent and mixed nonlinearities, e-print arXiv:2102.04030[Math.AP].], we prove that (1) the above equation has two positive radial solutions for $N=3$ , $2&lt; q&lt;4$ and $t&gt;0$ sufficiently large, which gives a rigorous proof of the numerical conjecture in [J. Dávila, M. del Pino and I. Guerra. Non-uniqueness of positive ground states of non-linear Schrödinger equations. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 106 (2013), 318–344.]; (2) there exists $t_q^{*}&gt;0$ for $2&lt; q\leq 4$ such that the above equation has ground-states for $t\geq t_q^{*}$ in the case of $2&lt; q&lt;4$ and for $t&gt;t_4^{*}$ in the case of $q=4$ , while the above equation has no ground-states for $0&lt; t&lt; t_q^{*}$ for all $2&lt; q\leq 4$ , which, together with the well-known results on ground-states of the above equation, almost completely solve the existence of ground-states, except for $N=3$ , $q=4$ and $t=t_4^{*}$ . Moreover, based on the almost completed study on ground-states to the above equation, we introduce a new argument to study the normalized solutions of the above equation to prove that there exists $0&lt;\overline {t}_{a,q}&lt;+\infty$ for $2&lt; q&lt;2+\frac {4}{N}$ such that the above equation has no positive normalized solutions for $t&gt;\overline {t}_{a,q}$ with $\int _{\mathbb {R}^{N}}|u|^{2}{\rm d}x=a^{2}$ , which, together with our recent study in [J. Wei and Y. Wu, Normalized solutions for Schrodinger equations with critical Sobolev exponent and mixed nonlinearities, e-print arXiv:2102.04030[Math.AP].], gives a completed answer to the open question proposed by Soave in [N. Soave. Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities: The Sobolev critical case. J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020) 108610.]. Finally, as applications of our new argument, we also study the following Schrödinger equation with a partial confinement: \[\left\{ \begin{aligned} &amp; -\Delta u+\lambda u+(x_1^{2}+x_2^{2})u=|u|^{p-2}u\quad\text{in }\mathbb{R}^{3},\\ &amp; u\in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{3}),\quad \int_{\mathbb{R}^{3}}|u|^{2}{\rm d}x=r^{2}, \end{aligned}\right.\] where $x=(x_1,x_2,x_3)\in \mathbb {R}^{3}$ , $\frac {10}{3}&lt; p&lt;6$ , $r&gt;0$ is a constant and $(u, \lambda )$ is a pair of unknowns with $\lambda$ being

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it