A Dynamic Hierarchical Framework for IoT-Assisted Digital Twin Synchronization in the Metaverse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metaverse, also known as the Internet of 3-D worlds, has recently attracted much attention from both academia and industry. Each virtual subworld, operated by a virtual service provider (VSP), provides a type of virtual service. Digital twins (DTs), namely, digital replicas of physical objects, are key enablers. Generally, a DT belongs to the party that develops it and establishes the communication link between the two worlds. However, in an interoperable metaverse, data-like DTs can be “shared” within the platform. Therefore, one set of DTs can be leveraged by multiple VSPs. As the quality of the shared DTs may not always be satisfying, in this article, we propose an agile solution, i.e., a dynamic hierarchical framework, in which a group of Internet of Things devices in the lower level are incentivized to collectively sense physical objects’ status information and VSPs in the upper level determine synchronization intensities to maximize their payoffs. We adopt an evolutionary game approach to model the devices VSP selections and a simultaneous differential game to model the optimal synchronization intensity control problem. We further extend it as a Stackelberg differential game by considering some VSPs to be first movers. We provide open-loop solutions based on the control theory for both formulations. We theoretically and experimentally show the existence, uniqueness, and stability of the equilibrium to the lower level game and further provide a sensitivity analysis for various system parameters. Experiments show that the proposed dynamic hierarchical game outperforms the baseline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".