MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292826080 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3201082

A Dynamic Hierarchical Framework for IoT-Assisted Digital Twin Synchronization in the Metaverse

2022· article· en· W4292826080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsComputer scienceMetaverseSynchronization (alternating current)Stackelberg competitionDistributed computingInteroperabilityService (business)Computer networkHuman–computer interactionVirtual realityWorld Wide WebMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaverse, also known as the Internet of 3-D worlds, has recently attracted much attention from both academia and industry. Each virtual subworld, operated by a virtual service provider (VSP), provides a type of virtual service. Digital twins (DTs), namely, digital replicas of physical objects, are key enablers. Generally, a DT belongs to the party that develops it and establishes the communication link between the two worlds. However, in an interoperable metaverse, data-like DTs can be “shared” within the platform. Therefore, one set of DTs can be leveraged by multiple VSPs. As the quality of the shared DTs may not always be satisfying, in this article, we propose an agile solution, i.e., a dynamic hierarchical framework, in which a group of Internet of Things devices in the lower level are incentivized to collectively sense physical objects’ status information and VSPs in the upper level determine synchronization intensities to maximize their payoffs. We adopt an evolutionary game approach to model the devices VSP selections and a simultaneous differential game to model the optimal synchronization intensity control problem. We further extend it as a Stackelberg differential game by considering some VSPs to be first movers. We provide open-loop solutions based on the control theory for both formulations. We theoretically and experimentally show the existence, uniqueness, and stability of the equilibrium to the lower level game and further provide a sensitivity analysis for various system parameters. Experiments show that the proposed dynamic hierarchical game outperforms the baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it