MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4292871231 · doi:10.37256/ccds.4120231653

An Overview of Trends in Information Systems: Emerging Technologies that Transform the Information Technology Industry

2022· article· en· W4292871231 on OpenAlexaff
Hamed Taherdoost

Bibliographic record

VenueCloud Computing and Data Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity Canada West
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceBig dataCloud computingInformation technologyField (mathematics)Computer scienceData scienceThe InternetAnalyticsEmerging technologiesAugmented realityWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technology is mainly characterized by being changed rapidly. In other words, it is recognized as the ever-changing playing field. Those who aim to stay in the technology field need to quickly get adapted to such constant changes in this field. Due to the high pace of information technology advances, it is required to identify and implement appropriate technologies by which the organizations can effectively stay and compete in the business through the accurate and real-time efficiency delivered by such technologies as cloud computing, internet of things (IoT), artificial intelligence, blockchain, big data analytics, virtual and augmented reality, 5g network, and, etc. These trends are critically important because turning and adapting to the latest trends in information technology and systems are largely contributing to meeting the consumers' technology-enabled demands. In this paper, the most widely used trends in information systems and technology will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCloud Computing and Data ScienceSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207