MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293243601 · doi:10.1109/tcad.2022.3197986

Bits-Ensemble: Toward Light-Weight Robust Deep Ensemble by Bits-Sharing

2022· article· en· W4293243601 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Decoding methodsEnsemble forecastingSecurity tokenAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robustness and uncertainty estimation is crucial to the safety of deep neural networks (DNNs) deployed on the edge. The deep ensemble model, composed of a set of individual DNNs (namely members), has strong performance in accuracy, uncertainty estimation, and robustness to out-of-distribution data and adversarial attacks. However, the storage and memory consumption increases linearly with the number of members within an ensemble. Previous works focus on selecting better members, layer-wise low-rank approximation of ensemble parameters, and designing partial ensemble model for reducing the ensemble size, thus lowering storage and memory consumption. In this work, we pay attention to the quantization of the ensemble, which serves as the last mile of network deployment. We propose a differentiable and parallelizable bit sharing scheme that allows the members to share the less significant bits of parameters, without hurting the performance, leaving alone the more significant bits. The intuition is that, numerically, more significant bits (e.g., the bit for the sign) are more useful in distinguishing a member from other members. For real deployment of the bit-sharing scheme, we further propose an efficient encoding-decoding scheme with minimal storage overhead. The experimental results show that, BitsEnsemble reduces the storage size of ensemble for over <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$22\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> , with only <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.36\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> increase in training latency, and no sacrifice of inference latency. The code is available in <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/ralphc1212/bitsensemble</uri> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it