Semi-supervised learning approach for localization and pose estimation of texture-less objects in cluttered scenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3D object recognition and 6D pose estimation are crucial and fundamental endeavours for industrial assembly line automation such as robotic controlled pick-and-place. While the problem on textured objects is extensively studied, it is still an open research topic for texture-less industrial parts, e.g, solid cylinder and hollow tube, which are symmetric and appear similar in shapes from many viewing perspectives, causing pose ambiguity. Also, the industrial assembly line environment is usually cluttered and the captured data is noisy, which makes this task even more challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel object localization and pose estimation technique using RGB images and depth maps of industrial assembly parts. Our segmentation model is fully morphological and unsupervised for localizing the region of interest containing the target object extracted from the depth map. Our segmentation technique is effective in the presence of partial occlusion, multiple objects, and cluttered scenes. We use a model based approach for object recognition based on Stochastic Gradient Descent trained on features of Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) and invariant moments of the region of interest containing the target object. We generate synthetic training images automatically from the CAD models of the industrial parts. We use a contour matching strategy based on Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) algorithm to estimate the optimal 6D pose of the object from a set of candidates. Experimental results show that our proposed approach competes and demonstrates advantages on the challenging T-LESS dataset compared to the state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".