MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293491576 · doi:10.1016/j.array.2022.100247

Semi-supervised learning approach for localization and pose estimation of texture-less objects in cluttered scenes

2022· article· en· W4293491576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueArray · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPoseComputer scienceSegmentation3D pose estimationPattern recognition (psychology)Image warpingHistogramRGB color modelObject (grammar)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D object recognition and 6D pose estimation are crucial and fundamental endeavours for industrial assembly line automation such as robotic controlled pick-and-place. While the problem on textured objects is extensively studied, it is still an open research topic for texture-less industrial parts, e.g, solid cylinder and hollow tube, which are symmetric and appear similar in shapes from many viewing perspectives, causing pose ambiguity. Also, the industrial assembly line environment is usually cluttered and the captured data is noisy, which makes this task even more challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel object localization and pose estimation technique using RGB images and depth maps of industrial assembly parts. Our segmentation model is fully morphological and unsupervised for localizing the region of interest containing the target object extracted from the depth map. Our segmentation technique is effective in the presence of partial occlusion, multiple objects, and cluttered scenes. We use a model based approach for object recognition based on Stochastic Gradient Descent trained on features of Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) and invariant moments of the region of interest containing the target object. We generate synthetic training images automatically from the CAD models of the industrial parts. We use a contour matching strategy based on Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) algorithm to estimate the optimal 6D pose of the object from a set of candidates. Experimental results show that our proposed approach competes and demonstrates advantages on the challenging T-LESS dataset compared to the state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it