MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293793189 · doi:10.1155/2022/1675736

Motion Planning and Tracking Control of Autonomous Vehicle Based on Improved <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi>A</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mi>∗</a:mi> </a:msup> </a:math> Algorithm

2022· article· en· W4293793189 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTracking (education)Motion (physics)Control (management)Computer scienceMotion controlArtificial intelligenceRobotPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The traditional <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi>A</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mi>∗</a:mi> </a:msup> </a:math> algorithm, applied to the motion planning of autonomous vehicles, easily causes high computational costs and excessive turning points generated in the planning path. In addition, the vehicle cannot track the path due to the unsmooth inflection point. To overcome these potential limitations, an improved <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <c:msup> <c:mrow> <c:mi>A</c:mi> </c:mrow> <c:mi>∗</c:mi> </c:msup> </c:math> algorithm-based motion planning algorithm and a tracking control strategy based on model predictive control theory were proposed in this work. The method of expanding the search neighborhood is adopted to improve the planning efficiency of <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <e:msup> <e:mrow> <e:mi>A</e:mi> </e:mrow> <e:mi>∗</e:mi> </e:msup> </e:math> algorithm. The artificial potential field method is also incorporated into the proposed <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <g:msup> <g:mrow> <g:mi>A</g:mi> </g:mrow> <g:mi>∗</g:mi> </g:msup> </g:math> algorithm. The resultant force generated by each potential field is further introduced into the evaluation function of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <i:msup> <i:mrow> <i:mi>A</i:mi> </i:mrow> <i:mi>∗</i:mi> </i:msup> </i:math> algorithm to plan the driving path, which could be suitable for autonomous vehicles. The sharp nodes in the path are smoothed by cubic quasi-uniform B-spline curve. The tracking control strategy is designed based on model predictive control theory to realize the accurate tracking of the planned path. Typical obstacle avoidance conditions were selected for co-simulation test verification. The experimental results show that the proposed motion planning algorithm and tracking control strategy can effectively plan the obstacle avoidance path and accurately track the path in different environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it