MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293868279 · doi:10.1109/crv55824.2022.00038

3DVQA: Visual Question Answering for 3D Environments

2022· article· en· W4293868279 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimodal Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsQuestion answeringComputer scienceTask (project management)Artificial intelligenceDomain (mathematical analysis)Modality (human–computer interaction)Relation (database)Point (geometry)Baseline (sea)Natural language processingInformation retrievalComputer visionData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a widely studied problem in computer vision and natural language processing. However, current approaches to VQA have been investigated primarily in the 2D image domain. We study VQA in the 3D domain, with our input being point clouds of real-world 3D scenes, instead of 2D images. We believe that this 3D data modality provide richer spatial relation information that is of interest in the VQA task. In this paper, we introduce the 3DVQA-ScanNet dataset, the first VQA dataset in 3D, and we investigate the performance of a spectrum of baseline approaches on the 3D VQA task.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207