MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294093842 · doi:10.1002/stc.3064

Acoustic emission sources localization and identification of complex metallic structures based on nearfield frequency space sparse decomposition

2022· article· en· W4294093842 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Control and Health Monitoring · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAcoustic emissionSIGNAL (programming language)Structural health monitoringIdentification (biology)AcousticsComputer scienceFrequency domainAlgorithmBiological systemPhysicsEngineeringComputer visionStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, structural health monitoring (SHM) of complex metallic structures based on the localization and identification of acoustic emission (AE) sources has become one of the most common condition monitoring method. However, existing methods are difficulty in accurately localizing and identifying AE sources generated by complex metallic structures that have been surface modified or machined. To overcome this problem, this paper presents a novel architecture named nearfield frequency space sparse decomposition (NFSSD) for localizing AE sources collected from complex metallic structures. Main contributions of the proposed NFSSD are to incorporate the decomposed subbands of AE signal in frequency into the traditional sparse decomposition (SD), which can extract more effective information and improve the identification of coherent AE sources. On this basis, NFSSD-based AE feature extraction scheme is further proposed for improving the accuracy and stability of AE source localization for complex metallic structures. First, all frequency point estimates of the original AE signal used to divide the subbands are obtained, where each frequency corresponds to the center frequency of the subband. Furthermore, the spatial spectrum of each subband signal is solved over the entire spatial domain, and the spatial spectrum of the signal is obtained to estimate the location of AE source. Two experimental results of coordinate-based AE source localization of complex metallic structures indicate that the proposed method has better AE source localization performance compared to conventional localization approaches. Specifically, the results show that the proposed approach can provide an effective theoretical reference for AE-based SHM of complex metallic structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it