APTHunter: Detecting Advanced Persistent Threats in Early Stages
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose APTHunter, a system for prompt detection of Advanced and Persistent Threats (APTs) in early stages. We provide an approach for representing the indicators of compromise that appear in the cyber threat intelligence reports and the relationships among them as provenance queries that capture the attacker’s malicious behavior. We use the kernel audit log as a reliable source for system activities and develop an optimized whole system provenance graph that provides the causal relationships and information flows among system entities in a compact format. Then, we model the threat hunting as a behavior match problem by applying provenance queries to the optimized provenance graph to find any hits as indicators of an APT attack. We evaluate APTHunter on adversarial engagements from DARPA over different OS platforms, as well as real-world APT campaigns. Based on our experimental results, APTHunter promptly and reliably detects attack artifacts in early stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it