MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4294495406 · doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104104

Descriptive Study of Medication Usage and Occurrence of Disease and Injury During Gestation in Thoroughbred Broodmares

2022· article· en· W4294495406 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Mouncey, Juan Carlos Arango‐Sabogal, Amanda M. de Mestre, Kristien Verheyen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Equine Veterinary Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyGestationIncidence (geometry)Prospective cohort studyConfidence intervalObstetricsCohort studyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study aimed to (1) describe the use of reproductive therapeutics; (2) estimate the incidence of disease and injury; and (3) describe non-reproductive medications administered during pregnancy in Thoroughbred broodmares. A prospective birth cohort was established on seven farms across the UK and Ireland. Details of dams' signalment, breeding history, reproductive management during the breeding season(s) and veterinary-attended episodes of illness or injury and medication usage during gestation were retrieved retrospectively for 275 pregnancies in 235 mares over two breeding seasons. Results are reported at pregnancy-level of mares with data available. Preoestrus medications, ovulatory agents and post-covering treatments were administered to 55% (n = 85/155, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 47-62), 64% (n = 101/157, 95% CI 57-71) and 73% (n = 109/150, 95% CI 65-79) of mares respectively. Antibiotics were utilized in 69% (n = 75/109, 95% CI 60-77) of post-covering treatments. Of mares with no visible fluid on post-covering ultrasound, 37% (n = 24/65, 95% CI 26-49) still received treatment. Thirty-four percent (n = 70/203, 95% CI 28-41) of mares suffered at least one veterinary-attended episode of disease or injury, with conditions affecting the musculoskeletal system (23%, n = 46/203, 95%CI 17-29) and placentitis (5%, n = 10/203, 95% CI 3-9) most prevalent. Forty-seven percent (n = 95/203, 95% CI 40-54) of mares received at least one non-reproductive medication during gestation, antibiotics (25%, n = 51/203, 95% CI 20-31) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (23%, n = 47/203, 95% CI 18-29) being most frequently prescribed. Post-covering treatments often included antibiotics and were sometimes given in the absence of fluid, highlighting a need to further understand therapeutic rationale. Disease occurrence and medication usage during gestation were frequent and warrant additional investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Equine Veterinary ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207