MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295021604 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525821

<i>Planck</i>2015 results

2016· article· en· W4295021604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoTrinity College
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceRussian Academy of SciencesGran Sasso Science InstituteHelsingin YliopistoINAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di CataniaUK Space AgencyMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueSorbonne UniversitéNational Taiwan UniversityMax-Planck-GesellschaftFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity College LondonPartnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBLNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterScience Foundation IrelandMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikUniversität HeidelbergChina Scholarship CouncilCardiff UniversityNational University of IrelandU.S. Department of EnergyMcGill UniversityHeidelberg Graduate School of Fundamental PhysicsTekesEuropean Space Agency
KeywordsPhysicsPlanckAstrophysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compute and investigate four types of imprint of a stochastic background of primordial magnetic fields (PMFs) on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies: the impact of PMFs on the CMB temperature and polarization spectra, which is related to their contribution to cosmological perturbations; the effect on CMB polarization induced by Faraday rotation; the impact of PMFs on the ionization history; magnetically-induced non-Gaussianities and related non-zero bispectra; and the magnetically-induced breaking of statistical isotropy. We present constraints on the amplitude of PMFs that are derived from different Planck data products, depending on the specific effect that is being analysed. Overall, Planck data constrain the amplitude of PMFs to less than a few nanoGauss, with different bounds that depend on the considered model. In particular, individual limits coming from the analysis of the CMB angular power spectra, using the Planck likelihood, are B 1 Mpc < 4.4 nG (where B 1 Mpc is the comoving field amplitude at a scale of 1 Mpc) at 95% confidence level, assuming zero helicity. By considering the Planck likelihood, based only on parity-even angular power spectra, we obtain B 1 Mpc < 5.6 nG for a maximally helical field. For nearly scale-invariant PMFs we obtain B 1 Mpc < 2.0 nG and B 1 Mpc < 0.9 nG if the impact of PMFs on the ionization history of the Universe is included in the analysis. From the analysis of magnetically-induced non-Gaussianity, we obtain three different values, corresponding to three applied methods, all below 5 nG. The constraint from the magnetically-induced passive-tensor bispectrum is B 1 Mpc < 2.8 nG. A search for preferred directions in the magneticallyinduced passive bispectrum yields B 1 Mpc < 4.5 nG, whereas the compensated-scalar bispectrum gives B 1 Mpc < 3 nG. The analysis of the Faraday rotation of CMB polarization by PMFs uses the Planck power spectra in EE and BB at 70 GHz and gives B 1 Mpc < 1380 nG. In our final analysis, we consider the harmonic-space correlations produced by Alfvn waves, finding no significant evidence for the presence of these waves. Together, these results comprise a comprehensive set of constraints on possible PMFs with Planck data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it