MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295408928 · doi:10.3390/su141811413

Computer-Vision-Based Statue Detection with Gaussian Smoothing Filter and EfficientDet

2022· article· en· W4295408928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainability · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSmoothingObject detectionFilter (signal processing)Object (grammar)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGaussianPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart tourism is a developing industry, and numerous nations are planning to establish smart cities in which technology is employed to make life easier and link nearly everything. Many researchers have created object detectors; however, there is a demand for lightweight versions that can fit into smartphones and other edge devices. The goal of this research is to demonstrate the notion of employing a mobile application that can detect statues efficiently on mobile applications, and also improve the performance of the models by employing the Gaussian Smoothing Filter (GSF). In this study, three object detection models, EfficientDet—D0, EfficientDet—D2 and EfficientDet—D4, were trained on original and smoothened images; moreover, their performance was compared to find a model efficient detection score that is easy to run on a mobile phone. EfficientDet—D4, trained on smoothened images, achieves a Mean Average Precision (mAP) of 0.811, an mAP-50 of 1 and an mAP-75 of 0.90.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it