MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295445025 · doi:10.1111/cts.13387

Manufacturing‐dependent change in biological activity of the <scp>TLR4</scp> agonist <scp>GSK1795091</scp> and implications for lipid A analog development

2022· article· en· W4295445025 on OpenAlexaff
Neeltje Steeghs, Aaron R. Hansen, Glenn J. Hanna, Elena Garralda, Haeseong Park, James Strauss, Michael Adam, Gossett A. Campbell, Jennifer Carver, Rachael Easton, Katherine Mays, Peter J. Skrdla, Herbert Struemper, Michael L. Washburn, Christopher Matheny, Sarina A. Piha‐Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Translational Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersChugai PharmaceuticalSanofi GenzymeMerck Sharp and DohmeEMD SeronoGenentechMacroGenicsSilverback TherapeuticsPrincipia BiopharmaPuma BiotechnologyF-star TherapeuticsAminex TherapeuticsBeiGeneMirati TherapeuticsJounce TherapeuticsWellcome TrustArray BioPharmaFive Prime TherapeuticsConquer Cancer FoundationTaiho PharmaceuticalNational Institutes of HealthRegeneron PharmaceuticalsBioMarin PharmaceuticalDaiichi Sankyo EuropeNational Cancer InstituteIntuitive SurgicalGilead SciencesBristol-Myers SquibbImmunoMedicsAdenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research FoundationEli Lilly and CompanyAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyGlaxoSmithKlineGateway for Cancer ResearchExelixisSanofiAbbott LaboratoriesIncytePfizerAmgen
KeywordsMedicinePharmacodynamicsAgonistChillsAdverse effectCytokinePharmacologyPharmacokineticsNauseaTLR4Clinical endpointImmunotherapyClinical trialImmune systemInternal medicineImmunologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A phase I trial (NCT03447314; 204686) evaluated the safety and efficacy of GSK1795091, a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist, in combination with immunotherapy (GSK3174998 [anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody], GSK3359609 [anti-ICOS monoclonal antibody], or pembrolizumab) in patients with solid tumors. The primary endpoint was safety; other endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics (PD). Manufacturing of GSK1795091 formulation was modified during the trial to streamline production and administration, resulting in reduced PD (cytokine) activity. Fifty-four patients received GSK1795091 with a combination partner; 32 received only the modified GSK1795091 formulation, 15 received only the original formulation, and seven switched mid-study from the original to the modified formulation. Despite the modified formulation demonstrating higher systemic GSK1795091 exposure compared with the original formulation, the transient, dose-dependent elevations in cytokine and chemokine concentrations were no longer observed (e.g., IP-10, IL10, IL1-RA). Most patients (51/54; 94%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the study. Safety profiles were similar between formulations, but a higher incidence of TEAEs associated with immune responses (chills, fatigue, pyrexia, nausea, and vomiting) were observed with the original formulation. No conclusions can be made regarding GSK1795091 anti-tumor activity due to the limited data collected. Manufacturing changes were hypothesized to have caused the change in biological activity in this study. Structural characterization revealed GSK1795091 aggregate size in the modified formulation to be twice that in the original formulation, suggesting a negative correlation between GSK1795091 aggregate size and PD activity. This may have important clinical implications for future development of structurally similar compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Translational ScienceSame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207