“From Kilobytes to Kilodaltons”: A Novel Algorithm for Medical Image Encryption based on the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the continued integration of technology in medicine, large amounts of patient data are often vulnerable to cyber-attacks. Medical data must be secured, however traditional cryptographic algorithms are inapplicable to medical images due to factors such as bulk data capacity, strong correlation among adjacent pixels, and high redundancy. To address the need for new medical image encryption algorithms, a novel approach based on the central dogma of molecular biology is proposed. The resulting algorithm has a linear runtime complexity, and is resistant to brute force, differential and statistical attacks. The algorithm advances the state-of-the-art in DNA-based image encryption and surpasses recent approaches in medical image encryption in its defence against cyber-attacks. Clinical Relevance- Secure data transmission and storage is critical for patient privacy. This algorithm increases the security of patient imaging when compared to image encryption algorithms in literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it