MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295592634 · doi:10.29313/bcss.v2i2.4525

Penanganan Data Hilang Menggunakan Metode MarkoviChain Monte Carlo (MCMC)

2022· article· en· W4295592634 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Statistics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMissing dataMarkov chain Monte CarloImputation (statistics)Monte Carlo methodStatisticsComputer sciencePhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In an observation or research, there are often cases where the data observed or researched is incomplete because the measuring instrument used is inaccurate, damaged, not recorded and other technical problems. Incomplete data is commonly referred to as missing data. Missing data is an important problem in various studies because it can lead to bias and inaccuracy in predicting the response from observations. The method used to estimate missing data in the writing of this thesis is the Multiple Imputation method. Multiple Imputation used is the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with Data Augmentation (DA) algorithm. The MCMC method is an algorithm for simulating conditional probability, which is suitable for any data pattern, where it is assumed that the underlying complete data follows a multivariate normal distribution. One case of incomplete data is the time-travel (Home – GSK) in Canada, the Province of Ontario in 2011 – 2012, for the variables Distance, Maxspeed and FuelEconomy. Based on the DA algorithm, complete data is formed for the three variables, so that these variables can be used for further analysis.
 Abstrak. Dalam sebuah pengamatan atau penelitian sering sekali terjadi kasus dimana data yang diamati atau diteliti tidak lengkap dikarenakan alat ukur yang digunakan kurang akurat, rusak, tidak tercatat dan masalah-masalah teknis lainnya. Data yang tidak lengkap biasa disebut sebagai data hilang (missing data). Data hilang merupakan suatu masalah penting dalam berbagai penelitian karena dapat menyebabkan terjadinya bias dan ketidakakuratan dalam memprediksi respon dari amatan. Metode yang digunakan untuk melakukan pendugaan data hilang pada penulisan artikel ini adalah metode Imputasi Ganda (Multiple Imputation). Imputasi Ganda (Multiple Imputation) yang digunakan adalah metode Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) dengan algoritma Data Augmentation (DA). Metode MCMC adalah algoritma untuk mensimulasikan peluang bersyarat, yang cocok untuk pola data apapun, di mana diasumsikan bahwa data lengkap yang mendasari mengikuti distribusi normal multivariat. Salah satu kasus data tidak lengkap yaitu time-travel (Home – GSK) yang ada di Negara Canada Provinsi Ontario pada tahun 2011 – 2012, untuk variabel Distance, Maxspeed dan FuelEconomy. Berdasarkan algoritma DA terbentuk data lengkap untuk ketiga variabel tersebut, sehingga variabel tersebut dapat digunakan untuk analisis lebih lanjut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it