Unsupervised change detection in SAR images based on generalized likelihood ratio test and a two-stage morphological filter
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) is an efficient method to generate difference image (DI) for change detection (CD) using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. GLRT is usually applied with a fixed-size moving window to the neighbourhood regions in multitemporal SAR images. The fixed window may be however not optimal for all the pixels under test. To solve disadvantages of the GLRT method, an adaptive circular window is proposed in this work. While the adaptive square window and the best fixed square window achieve an average Kappa coefficient of 83.55% and 82.12%, respectively, the adaptive circular window improves the average Kappa coefficient by 83.65% in six datasets. As another difficulty, speckle noise reduces quality of DI in SAR change detection. Three steps are considered to minimize effects of the speckle noise: (1) a two-stage morphological filter is suggested to reduce the speckle noise; (2) to generate DI, the adaptive circular window for generalized likelihood ratio test (ACWGLRT) is proposed that reduces influence of the speckle noise while preserves the edge details of multitemporal images; and (3) spatial fuzzy c-means (SFCM) is used to reduce effects of the residual speckle-noise during DI classification. The experimental results show superior performance of the proposed change detection method with respect to several competitors. The proposed method has the best Kappa coefficient and percentage correct classification (PCC) in four datasets of Ottawa, San Francisco, Farmland C, and Inland water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it