MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4295973424 · doi:10.3390/math10162825

The Development of PSO-ANN and BOA-ANN Models for Predicting Matric Suction in Expansive Clay Soil

2022· article· en· W4295973424 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpansive clayGeotechnical engineeringLandslideLeveeWater contentCivil engineeringEnvironmental scienceShear strength (soil)SuctionEngineeringSoil waterSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disasters have different shapes, and one of them is sudden landslides, which can put the safety of highway users at risk and result in crucial economic damage. Along with the risk of human losses, each day a highway malfunctions causes high expenses to citizens, and repairing a failed highway is a time- and cost-consuming process. Therefore, correct highway functioning can be categorized as a high-priority reliability factor for cities. By detecting the failure factors of highway embankment slopes, monitoring them in real-time, and predicting them, managers can make preventive, preservative, and corrective operations that would lead to continuing the function of intracity and intercity highways. Expansive clay soil causes many infrastructure problems throughout the United States, and much of Mississippi’s highway embankments and fill slopes are constructed of this clay soil, also known as High-Volume Change Clay Soil (HVCCS). Landslides on highway embankments are caused by recurrent volume changes due to seasonal moisture variations (wet-dry cycles), and the moisture content of the HVCCS impacts soil shear strength in a vadose zone. Soil Matric Suction (SMS) is another indication of soil shear strength, an essential element to consider. Machine learning develops high-accuracy models for predicting the SMS. The current work aims to develop hybrid intelligent models for predicting the SMS of HVCCS (known as Yazoo clay) based on field instrumentation data. To achieve this goal, six Highway Slopes (HWS) in Jackson Metroplex, Mississippi, were extensively instrumented to track changes over time, and the field data was analyzed and generated to be used in the proposed models. The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with a Bayesian Regularization Backpropagation (BR-BP) training algorithm was used, and two intelligent systems, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA) were developed to optimize the ANN-BR algorithm for predicting the HWS’ SMS by utilizing 13,690 data points for each variable. Several performance indices, such as coefficient of determination (R2), Mean Square Error (MSE), Variance Account For (VAF), and Regression Error Characteristic (REC), were also computed to analyze the models’ accuracy in prediction outcomes. Based on the analysis results, the PSO-ANN outperformed the BOA-ANN, and both had far better performance than ANN-BR. Moreover, the rainfall had the highest impact on SMS among all other variables and it should be carefully monitored for landslide prediction HWS. The proposed hybrid models can be used for SMS prediction for similar slopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it