Stable standing waves of nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p style='text-indent:20px;'>We study the existence and orbital stability of standing waves of nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations with a general nonlinear term <p style='text-indent:20px;'><disp-formula> <label/> <tex-math id="FE1"> \begin{document}$ \begin{equation*} \mathrm{i} u_t-\left(-\Delta\right)^s u +f\left(u\right) = 0, \ \left(t, x\right)\in\mathbb{R}_+\times\mathbb{R}^N. \end{equation*} $\end{document} </tex-math></disp-formula> <p style='text-indent:20px;'>We investigate the minimizing problem with <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ L^2 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>-constraint: <p style='text-indent:20px;'><disp-formula> <label/> <tex-math id="FE2"> \begin{document}$ \begin{equation*} E_{\alpha} = \inf\Big\{\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^N}\!|(-\Delta)^{\frac{s}{2}}u|^2\mathrm{d}x-\int_{\mathbb{R}^N}\!F(|u|)\mathrm{d}x\ \Big|\ u\in H^{s}(\mathbb{R}^N), \|u\|^2_{L^2(\mathbb{R}^N)} = \alpha\Big\}. \end{equation*} $\end{document} </tex-math></disp-formula> <p style='text-indent:20px;'>The existence and non-existence of global minimizers with respect to <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ E_{\alpha} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> are established for all possible values of <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ \alpha. $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> Under some general assumptions on the nonlinear term <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ f(u) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, there exists a constant <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ \alpha_0\ge 0 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> such that a global minimizer exists for <inline-formula><tex-math id="M6">\begin{document}$ E_\alpha $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><tex-math id="M7">\begin{document}$ \alpha>\alpha_0 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, and there is no global minimizer with respect to <inline-formula><tex-math id="M8">\begin{document}$ E_{\alpha} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><tex-math id="M9">\begin{document}$ 0<\alpha<\alpha_0. $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> By virtue of concentration-compactness argument and the strict subadditivity of <inline-formula><tex-math id="M10">\begin{document}$ E_\alpha $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, the strong convergence of minimizing sequence is obtained. Moreover, we present some criteria which determine <inline-formula><tex-math id="M11">\begin{document}$ \alpha_0 = 0 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><tex-math id="M12">\begin{document}$ \alpha_0>0 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, and the existence of global minimizers for <inline-formula><tex-math id="M13">\begin{document}$ E_{\alpha_0}. $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> Besides, we show the orbital stability of the global minimizers set. Finally, we prove that an energy minimizer is a least action solution by Pohozaev identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it