MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4297095015 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3209256

iCache: An Intelligent Caching Scheme for Dynamic Network Environments in ICN-Based IoT Networks

2022· article· en· W4297095015 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Zhang, Xin Wei, Chung–Horng Lung, Yu Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScheme (mathematics)Internet of ThingsIntelligent NetworkDistributed computingEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced network technologies and ubiquitous connected devices are boosting the development of the Internet of Things (IoT) at an unprecedented pace. However, as most of the connected IoT devices are battery powered, the energy consumption issue has become the bottleneck of the IoT’s development. Caching is a promising approach to reducing the energy consumption of the battery-powered devices since the requested data packets can be retrieved from intermediate nodes in the network, e.g., routers, instead of from the remote battery-powered IoT devices, which allows the IoT devices to spend more time in the sleep mode. To realize in-network caching and overcome the IP-based networks’ inefficiency support for IoT, building IoT over information-centric networking (ICN) is a promising approach advocated by researchers. However, existing works in this area assume the network environments are static, which hinders the development of existing approaches in the real dynamic network environments. In this article, we leverage the deep$Q$-networks (DQNs) to propose an intelligent caching scheme (named as iCache) that can automatically adjust the caching nodes’ caching parameters to make caching decisions for the dynamic network environments. Extensive evaluations were conducted and the results show that the proposed iCache outperforms the existing approaches in terms of the total energy consumption (e.g., more than 29% reduction compared to the caching transient data (CTD) caching scheme) and the average number of hops (e.g., more than 20% reduction compared to the CTD caching scheme).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207