A novel time‐domain numerical methodology for the electromagnetic analysis of an H‐plane tee power divider
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A time‐domain numerical methodology for the transient analysis of multisection waveguide power dividers is proposed. Waveguide power dividers are essential components of microwave systems for high‐power applications. A numerical strategy based on the 3D discontinuous Galerkin time‐domain finite element method is used to estimate the electromagnetic propagation inside a power divider with three ports. The proposed approach leads to simulations that are fast, robust, and accurate, this being the result of a parallel local discretisation of the full‐wave time‐domain Maxwell's equations on unstructured tetrahedral meshes. The stability of the overall numerical scheme is obtained using an upwind numerical flux, an implicit second‐order accurate time integration scheme, and Whitney's edge elements. Good agreements are obtained when the computed results are compared with other HFSS simulation results, and with measurement results found in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it