A geographic information model for 3-D environmental suitability analysis in railway alignment optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Railway alignment design is a complicated problem affected by intricate environmental factors. Although numerous alignment optimization methods have been proposed, a general limitation among them is the lack of a spatial environmental suitability analysis to guide the subsequent alignment search. Consequently, many unfavorable regions in the study area are still searched, which significantly degrades optimization efficiency. To solve this problem, a geographic information model is proposed for evaluating the environmental suitability of railways. Initially, the study area is abstracted as a spatial voxel set and the 3-D reachable ranges of railways are determined. Then, a geographic information model is devised which considers topographic influencing factors (including those affecting structural cost and stability) as well as geologic influencing factors (including landslides and seismic impacts) for different railway structures. Afterward, a 3-D environmental suitability map can be generated using a multi-criteria decision-making approach to combine the considered factors. The map is further integrated into the alignment optimization process based on a 3-D distance transform algorithm. The proposed model and method are applied to two complex realistic railway cases. The results demonstrate that they can considerably improve the search efficiency and also find better alignments compared to the best alternatives obtained manually by experienced human designers and produced by a previous distance transform algorithm as well as a genetic algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".