Imaginer le devenir des écrans : l’interface cérébrale de Black Mirror
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En plus de constituer des objets usuels de notre quotidien, les écrans sont investis d’un imaginaire fantasmatique. C’est en parallèle de leurs développements techniques, notamment de leurs métamorphoses physiques, que la science-fiction imagine le devenir des écrans. Cet article se propose d’analyser l’une des figures marquantes de cet imaginaire, à savoir l’interface cérébrale. L’épisode « The Entire History of You » de la série télévisée d’anthologie Black Mirror (2011) servira de point de départ à la réflexion. Il s’agira en premier lieu de comprendre le fonctionnement du dispositif fictionnel afin de saisir les conséquences d’une telle technologie sur la faculté mémorielle et sur les personnages. Il sera ensuite question d’analyser l’ « intermédialité fictionnelle » à l’oeuvre dans la figure d’interface cérébrale pour enfin explorer la portée heuristique de l’épisode de science-fiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".