MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301223987 · doi:10.33137/rr.v30i4.9099

Humanism and the Culture of Renaissance Europe

2006· article· en· W4301223987 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceHumanismArtArt historyClassicsPhilosophyLiteratureTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

existentiel » (302).La dernière contribution, de Dominique Brancher, revient au lien entre la médecine et le scepticisme de Montaigne auquel la première a fait allusion.Se centrant sur l'image de la rhubarbe (II, 12), elle révèle de façon ingénieuse toutes les connotations de cette image dans un contexte pyrrhonien.C'est à Marie-Luce Demonet de clore ce recueil et elle revient à la métaphore illustrée ludiquement par le frontispice et à la médaille de Montaigne, nous rappelant que « l'examen des opinions dans la balance est un mouvement perpétuel » (323).Il est certain que le recueil offre matière à réflexion.On peut se demander si l'argumentation n'est pas parfois quelque peu forcée, si les rapprochements ne sont pas fortuits, mais l'essentiel est qu'il s'agit d'un recueil qui nous incite à revoir constamment notre opinion sur Montaigne, à constater de nouvelles perspectives et à rester sceptique devant notre prétendue compréhension des Essais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it