MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4301936558 · doi:10.1111/1468-0319.12302

World Economic Prospects Monthly

2017· article· en· W4301936558 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Outlook · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEconomic and Technological Developments in Russia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceEconomicsEconomic recoveryQuarter (Canadian coin)Interest rateFinancial crisisIndustrial productionOrder (exchange)International economicsMonetary economicsEconomic policyMacroeconomicsFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overview: Steady recovery shows no signs of slowing ▀ We expect the solid and broad‐based world recovery to continue, and still see a slight pick‐up in global GDP growth from 2.9% this year to 3.0% in 2018, unchanged from a month ago. This points to the most sustained period of robust global growth since the initial recovery from the financial crisis. ▀ Purchasing managers' surveys suggest that growth in advanced economies strengthened further through the summer. By contrast, the available data suggest that industrial production in some of the advanced economies weakened last quarter, and world trade went through a soft patch in early summer. ▀ But US industrial output will have been dampened by the recent hurricanes, while the Eurozone figures are often volatile in the summer months. And the limited trade data for the latter part of Q3 point to a reacceleration in trade growth. On balance, we expect the solid pace of global growth in H1 to be maintained in H2. ▀ The broad‐based global economic strength has coincided with a slightly more hawkish tone from some central banks. We now see the Fed raising US interest rates in December – in addition to the two hikes already pencilled in for 2018 – reflecting its apparent desire for a slightly faster pace of normalisation in order to avoid potentially more aggressive rate hikes later in the cycle. Meanwhile, the Bank of England is expected to raise interest rates in November. ▀ While the Fed's stance and Eurozone political developments have led the euro to weaken against the US dollar, we think further sustained falls in the euro are unlikely in an environment where the Eurozone continues to record well‐above‐trend growth and underlying inflation pressures is gradually building. ▀ Q2's strong performance in many emerging markets (EMs) was probably sustained in Q3. Despite EM assets recently coming under pressure, we still expect them to be resilient to Fed tightening, supported by firmer commodity prices, still‐attractive carry and, more importantly, a widening growth differential over advanced economies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4480.482

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic OutlookSame topicEconomic and Technological Developments in RussiaFrench-language works237,207