Association Between Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score and Efficacy and Safety Outcomes With Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Stroke From Large-Vessel Occlusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has been found to reduce functional disability in patients with acute stroke due to large-vessel occlusion. However, the extent of the ischemic region, measured using Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scores, may limit the efficacy of EVT. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of EVT according to ASPECTS 3 or less vs 4 to 5. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial (RESCUE-Japan LIMIT) was an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2018 to December 2021 at 45 stroke centers across Japan. The trial enrolled adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with a large ischemic region, defined as ASPECTS 3 to 5 primarily determined by magnetic resonance imaging, with occlusion site at the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery segment 1. Among 203 enrolled patients, 1 withdrew consent and 202 were included in the original trial and secondary analysis. This secondary analysis was conducted in April 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to EVT with medical therapy or medical therapy alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and symptomatic and any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Results: Among 202 patients, 106 (52%) had ASPECTS 3 or less (mean [SD] age, 76.7 [9.6] years; 54 female individuals [50.9%]) and 96 had ASPECTS 4 to 5 (mean [SD] age, 75.6 [10.6] years; 36 female individuals [37.5%]). Of patients with ASPECTS 3 or less, 12 (21.4%) in the EVT group and 9 (18.0%) in the no EVT group had an mRS score of 0 to 3 (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% CI, 0.47-3.26). Of patients with ASPECTS 4 to 5, 19 patients (43.2%) in the EVT group and 4 (7.7%) in the no EVT group had an mRS score of 0 to 3 at 90 days (OR, 9.12; 95% CI, 2.80-29.70; interaction P = .01). The ordinal shift across the range of mRS scores toward a better outcome was not significant in those with ASPECTS or 3 or less (common OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.79-3.10) but was significant in those with ASPECTS 4 to 5 (common OR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.07-9.71; interaction P = .046). The risk of intracranial hemorrhage was significantly increased in patients with ASPECTS 3 or less when EVT was conducted (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.84-9.32) and nonsignificantly increased in those with ASPECTS 4 to 5 (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 0.89-4.73; interaction P = .24). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, EVT was associated with improved 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusive stroke and ASPECTS was 4 to 5 but not in those with ASPECTS 3 or less. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03702413.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".