MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306249727 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1984045/v1

A Constrained Robust Switching MPC Structure for Tilt-Rotor UAVs Trajectory Tracking Problem

2022· preprint· en· W4306249727 on OpenAlexafffund
Abolfazl Eskandarpour, Mehran Mehrandezh, Kamal Gupta, Alejandro Ramirez‐Serrano, Mohammad Soltanshah

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of CalgarySimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrajectoryTilt (camera)Control theory (sociology)Tracking (education)Rotor (electric)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In tilt-rotor UAVs, both the fuselage and tilting rotors contribute to the vehicle's rotational motion. Consequently, the system's dynamics rise to a highly-nonlinear system, making it challenging to find feasible and desired control solutions. The common control practices devise a logic-based controller to switch between different flight modes or map the control inputs to the conventional helicopter-type control inputs. However, they fail to provide energy-efficient fast trajectory tracking, especially in the presence of external disturbances. This paper proposes a general-model dynamic formulation and a two-layered constrained Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategy to tackle the trajectory tracking problem for tilt-rotor UAVs. After splitting the vehicle's dynamics into translational and rotational parts, a constrained Linear MPC (LMPC) is designed for the translational dynamic to follow a reference trajectory. We formulate the LMPC as a Quadratically-Constrained Quadratic Problem (QCQP) that leads to a feasible set-point solution for the rotational control layer without violating the physical constraints. Also, an optimizer is designed to generate a thrust vector, which leverages the vehicle's full potential via a continuous transition between the rotation in the fuselage and that in tilting rotors. In the second layer, the nonlinear rotational dynamics are approximated via piecewise affine (PWA) subsystems. A constrained Robust Switching MPC (RSMPC) is then designed to follow the first layer's generated trajectories (Euler angles and the thrust vectors) while preserving the system's stability, feasibility, and robustness in the presence of external disturbances. Furthermore, by providing an augmented dynamic model, this control design would allow for directly incorporating actuator constraints into the problem formulation. We demonstrate the controller's performance and effectiveness via simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAerospace Engineering and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207