MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306752936

Navigating with highly precise odometry and noisy GPS: a case study *

2016· preprint· en· W4306752936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geography and Cartography
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdometryGlobal Positioning SystemArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceVisual odometryGeodesyGeographyRobotMobile robotTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For linear systems, the Kalman filter perfectly handles rank deficiencies in the process noise covariance matrix, i.e., deterministic information. Yet, in a nonlinear setting this poses great challenges to the extended Kalman filter (EKF). In this paper we consider a simplified nonlinear car model with deterministic dynamics, i.e., perfect odometry, and noisy position measurements. Simulations evidence the EKF, when used as a nonlinear observer, 1-fails to correctly encode the physical implications of the deterministic dynamics 2-fails to converge even for small initial estimation errors. On the other hand, the invariant (I)EKF, a variant of the EKF that accounts for the symmetries of the problem 1-correctly encodes the physical implications of the deterministic information 2-is mathematically proved to (almost) globally converge, with explicit convergence rates, whereas the EKF does not even locally converge in our simulations. This study more generally suggests the IEKF is way more natural than the EKF, for high precision navigation purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it