MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4306867612 · doi:10.1080/10106049.2022.2138565

Spatial prediction of soil properties through hybridized random forest model and combination of reflectance spectroscopy and environmental covariates

2022· article· en· W4306867612 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeocarto International · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovariateRandom forestEnvironmental scienceReflectivityGeographyRemote sensingSpatial analysisForestrySoil scienceStatisticsMathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial information on land and soil resources are critical towards addressing land degradation for ensuring sustainable soil and crop management. To address these needs, digital soil mapping techniques have emerged as an efficient and low-cost solution. Although digital soil mapping has typically leveraged geospatial environmental variables (e.g. remote sensing), the application and integration of spectroscopic data with those environmental variables remain limited. Hence, this study combines visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy, remote sensing, and topographic data and applies random forests, hybridized with particle swarm optimization algorithm (RF + PSO), to predict the spatial variability of soil clay content, electrical conductivity (EC), and calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) for 370 km2 of agricultural land in western Iran. Using a conditioned Latin hypercube approach, 220 soil samples at the 0–20 cm depth increment were acquired throughout the study area. Three sets of environmental covariates were tested: Scenario A (Vis-NIR spectroscopy data), Scenario B (environmental data), and Scenario C (Vis-NIR spectroscopy + environmental data). According to the 10-fold cross-validation procedure with 100 replications, the RF + PSO model showed an acceptable level accuracy for all scenarios, although the accuracy of the RF + PSO model using the Scenario C data was higher than all other scenarios: the Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient values were 0.77, 0.83, and 0.74 for the clay contents, EC, and CCE, respectively. The results demonstrated that the combination of Vis-NIR spectroscopic data and commonly available environmental covariates provided the best input data for the hybridized model and enhanced its performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it