MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307348793 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2181404/v1

Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress during the Russo- Ukrainian war in 2022: A Comparison of the Populations in Poland, Ukraine and Taiwan

2022· preprint· en· W4307348793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianAnxietyMental healthChinaCoping (psychology)Snowball samplingDepression (economics)PsychologyDemographyMedicineClinical psychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatrySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> Background Ukraine has been embroiled in an increasingly war since February 2022. In addition to Ukrainians, the Russo-Ukraine war has affected Poles due to the refugee crisis and the Taiwanese, who are facing a potential crisis with China. We examined the mental health status and associated factors in Ukraine, Poland and Taiwan. The data will be used for future reference as the war is still ongoing. Methods From March 8 to April 26, 2022, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques in Ukraine, Poland and Taiwan. Depression, anxiety and stress were measured using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress (DASS)-21 item scale; post-traumatic stress symptoms by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and coping strategies by the Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE). We used univariate and multivariate linear regression to identify factors associated with DASS-21 and IES-R scores. Results There were 1625 participants (Poland: 1053; Ukraine: 385; Taiwan: 188) in this study. Ukrainian participants reported significantly higher DASS-21 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and IES-R (p &lt; 0.01) scores than Poles and Taiwanese. Although Taiwanese participants were not directly involved in the war, their mean IES-R scores (40.37 ± 16.86) were only slightly lower than Ukrainian participants (41.36 ± 14.94), and Taiwanese were associated with higher IES-R scores (<italic>p</italic> = 0.029) after adjustment of other variables. Taiwanese reported significantly higher avoidance score (1.60 ± 0.47) than the Polish (0.87 ± 0.53) and Ukrainian (0.91 ± 0.5) participants (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). More than half of the Taiwanese (54.3%) and Polish (80.3%) participants were distressed by the war scenes in the media. More than half (52.5%) of the Ukrainian participants would not seek psychological help despite a significantly higher prevalence of psychological distress. Multivariate linear regression analyses found that female gender, Ukrainian citizenship, self-rating health status, past psychiatric history and avoidance coping were significantly associated with higher DASS-21 and IES-R scores after adjustment of other variables (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). Conclusion We have identified mental health sequelae in Ukrainian, Poles and Taiwanese with the ongoing Russo-Ukraine war. Risk factors associated with developing depression, anxiety, stress and post-traumatic stress symptoms include female gender, self-rating health status, past psychiatric history and avoidance coping. Early resolution of the conflict, online mental health interventions, delivery of psychotropic medications and distraction techniques may help to improve the mental health of people who stay inside and outside Ukraine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it