MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307870142 · doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.1002697

Python tools for ESA’s Swarm mission: VirES for Swarm and surrounding ecosystem

2022· article· en· W4307870142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwarm behaviourPython (programming language)Computer scienceInterfacingCloud computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ESA’s Swarm mission is a constellation probing both Earth’s interior and geospace, delivering magnetic and plasma measurements which are used to generate many derived data products. From empirical magnetic field models of the core, crust, ionosphere, and magnetosphere, to multi-point estimates of ionospheric currents and in-situ plasma properties, these are challenging to navigate, process, and visualize. The VirES for Swarm platform ( https://vires.services ) has been built to tackle this problem, providing tools to increase usability of Swarm data products. The VirES (Virtual environments for Earth Scientists) platform provides both a graphical web interface and an API to access and visualise Swarm data and models. This is extended with a cloud-hosted development environment powered by JupyterHub (the “Virtual Research Environment/VRE”). VirES provides two API’s: the full VirES API for which a dedicated Python client is provided, viresclient , and the more interoperable Heliophysics API (HAPI). The VRE is furnished with a bespoke Python environment containing thematic libraries supporting science with Swarm. This service aims to ease the pathway for scientists writing computer code to analyze Swarm data products, increase opportunities for collaboration, and leverage cloud technologies. Beyond simply providing data and model access to Python users, it is extremely helpful to provide higher-level analysis and visualization tools, and ready-to-use code recipes that people can explore and extend. Critically for space physics, this involves crossover with many other datasets and so it is highly valuable to embed such tools within the wider data and software ecosystems. Through Swarm DISC (Data, Innovation, and Science Cluster), we are tackling this through cookbooks and Python libraries. Cookbooks are built and presented using Jupyter technologies, and tested to work within the VRE. A new library we are building is SwarmPAL , which includes tools for time-frequency analysis and inversion of magnetic field measurements for electric current systems, among others, while relying on the VirES server to provide data portability and other utilities. This paper reviews the current state of these tools and services for Swarm, particularly in the context of the Python in Heliophysics Community, and the wider heliophysics and geospace data environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it