NFVLearn: A multi‐resource, long short‐term memory‐based virtual network function resource usage prediction architecture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Virtual resource load prediction in network function virtualization (NFV) is the subject of intense research due to its crucial role in enabling proactive resource adaptation in dynamic NFV environments whose resource demand constantly changes. Several long short‐term memory (LSTM)‐based approaches have been proposed to forecast the resource load of multiple resource attributes of a virtual network function (VNF) in a service function chain (SFC). In this article, we present NFVLearn, a flexible multivariate, many‐to‐many LSTM‐based model which uses different types of resource load history (CPU, memory, I/O bandwidth) from various VNFs of an SFC to predict future loads of multiple resources of a VNF. We then compare four novel automated input selection frameworks for NFVLearn. Simulations on those frameworks based on graph neural networks, Pearson correlation coefficient, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and Kendall rank correlation coefficient demonstrate that models using lesser, highly correlated input features retain high prediction root mean squared error accuracy and coefficients of determination scores by leveraging resource attribute inter‐dependencies from the SFC. Those results show that resource attribute interdependency‐based input feature selection frameworks can reduce overhead in the control plane while keeping high accuracy and high fidelity resource load prediction of multiple resource attributes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".