MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4307949351 · doi:10.3390/a15110399

Design of HIFU Treatment Plans Using Thermodynamic Equilibrium Algorithm

2022· article· en· W4307949351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgorithms · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKorea Electrotechnology Research Institute
KeywordsThermodynamic equilibriumBenchmark (surveying)PopulationComputer scienceHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundThermodynamic processEvolutionary algorithmMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsUltrasoundMaterial propertiesPhysicsThermodynamicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive medical procedure, which is mainly used to ablate tumors externally by focusing on them with high-frequency ultrasound. Because a single ablation can process only a small volume of tissue, a succession of ablations is required to treat a large volume of cancerous tissue. In order to maximize the therapeutic effect and reduce side effects such as skin burns, careful preoperative treatment planning must be performed to determine the focal location and sonication time for each ablation. This paper proposes a novel optimization algorithm, called the thermodynamic equilibrium algorithm (TEA), inspired by the behavior of thermodynamic systems reaching their equilibrium states. Like other evolutionary algorithms, TEA starts with an initial population. Gas chambers at various thermodynamic states are employed as representatives of the population individuals, and the equilibrium state is regarded as the global minimum. The movement of thermodynamic parameters in the direction of reducing the temperature gradient forms the basis of the proposed evolutionary algorithm. During this movement, the second law of thermodynamics is checked to ensure that entropy will increase in each process. This movement leads to the state where most of the systems are at equilibrium. In this state, the systems are localized at the same position and have the same cost as the global minimum. The TEA was applied to several well-known unconstrained and constrained benchmark cost functions, and the performance was compared with other well-known optimization algorithms. The results showed that the TEA has high potential to handle various types of optimization problems with a good convergence rate and high precision. Finally, the suggested evolutionary approach is applied to HIFU treatment regimens adopting a map of patient-specific material properties and an accurate thermal model. High-quality treatment plans could be created using the suggested method, and the average amount of tissue that is over- or under-treated was less than 0.08 percent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it