MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Science of falling and injury in older adults – Do all falls lead to death?: Literature Review

2022· article· en· W4308112113 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerontechnology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChinese University of Hong KongCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAGE-WELL
KeywordsFalling (accident)Fear of fallingPhysical medicine and rehabilitationFalls in older adultsLead (geology)MedicineGerontologyPsychologyForensic engineeringInjury preventionPoison controlMedical emergencyEngineeringPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consequences of falls in older adults (i.e., hip fracture) are often life-threatening, and prevention is important. While tremendous efforts have been made so far to address fall-related hip fractures in older adults, fall-related death rates in older adults have continuously increased over the decades, requiring continued supports for research, development and application in safe activities of daily living. CONTENT Our symposium is designed to provide basic knowledge on the science of falling and hip fracture in older adults and associated intervention strategies (i.e., primarily wearable hip protectors), with a hope to guide future research and practice to address the issue. The symposium discusses hip fracture mechanisms and associated risk factors with a great emphasis on the circumstances of falls that lead to hip fracture and the role of soft tissue over the hip region, so called "natural padding device", in determining hip fractures during a fall. The symposium also discusses wearable hip protectors, including its user compliance (acceptance and adherence) and novel design of hip protectors. STRUCTURE Choi first provides an overview on the science under fall-related hip fractures in older adults. Next, Yang talks about circumstances of falls that lead to hip fractures in older adults. After that, Lim talks about the role of trochanteric soft tissue (what/why is important) in context of hip fracture risk in the event of a fall. Finally, Ho provides some results on the user compliance of hip protectors in Hong Kong area and a newly designed hip protector that may help to improve protection and compliance. CONCLUSION A potential reason why the fall-related injuries in older adults have not been sufficiently addressed so far, may be due, in part, to ineffective interventions developed up on incomplete understanding of the injury mechanisms and circumstances. Continued efforts and concerns are warranted to solve the growing problem in a fast ageing society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it