MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308409588 · doi:10.36834/cmej.75603

Cartographier en 3D avec MapIt : une plus-value pour un parcours de professionnalisation selon la perspective étudiante

2022· article· fr· W4308409588 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Manon Guay, Audrey Clavet, Ana ̧ïs Métivier-Francis, Kathryne Chamberland, Mathieu Labbé, F. Leblanc, François Michaud

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Education Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInformation Technology and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessionalizationPerspective (graphical)Adaptation (eye)Value (mathematics)Element (criminal law)HumanitiesPsychologySociologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceArtArtificial intelligenceSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Énoncé des implications de la recherche Durant la pandémie, l’application MapIt a été intégrée dans un programme d’ergothérapie pour soutenir l’apprentissage à distance de l’adaptation de l’environnement bâti. MapIt permet de cartographier des pièces d’un domicile, puis d’en générer un modèle en 3D pour la visualisation et la prise de mesures virtuelles. Les étudiantes expriment que le recours à MapIt durant leur formation mène à incarner les rôles attendus d’une ergothérapeute. Pour inspirer d’autres bonnes idées pédagogiques, cet article présente comment MapIt peut soutenir l’apprentissage en situations authentiques, un élément clé d’un parcours de professionnalisation, s’approchant des réalités vécues par les personnes patientes, clientes ou intervenantes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0140.011
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Education JournalSame topicInformation Technology and LearningFrench-language works237,207