ctFS: Replacing File Indexing with Hardware Memory Translation through Contiguous File Allocation for Persistent Memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Persistent byte-addressable memory (PM) is poised to become prevalent in future computer systems. PMs are significantly faster than disk storage, and accesses to PMs are governed by the Memory Management Unit (MMU) just as accesses with volatile RAM. These unique characteristics shift the bottleneck from I/O to operations such as block address lookup—for example, in write workloads, up to 45% of the overhead in ext4-DAX is due to building and searching extent trees to translate file offsets to addresses on persistent memory. We propose a novel contiguous file system, ctFS, that eliminates most of the overhead associated with indexing structures such as extent trees in the file system. ctFS represents each file as a contiguous region of virtual memory, hence a lookup from the file offset to the address is simply an offset operation, which can be efficiently performed by the hardware MMU at a fraction of the cost of software-maintained indexes. Evaluating ctFS on real-world workloads such as LevelDB shows it outperforms ext4-DAX and SplitFS by 3.6× and 1.8×, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".