MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4308989353 · doi:10.1016/j.shj.2022.100118

Impact of Paravalvular Leak on Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Meta-Analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived Individual Patient Data

2022· article· en· W4308989353 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Pompeu Sá, Xander Jacquemyn, Jef Van den Eynde, Panagiotis Tasoudis, Ozgun Erten, Serge Sicouri, Francisco Macedo, Tilak Pasala, Ryan Kaple, Alexander Weymann, Arjang Ruhparwar, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Philippe Pîbarot, Basel Ramlawi

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Heart · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersThoracic Surgery FoundationSociety of Thoracic SurgeonsReuter FoundationSiragusa Foundation
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHazard ratioConfidence intervalCardiologyMortality rateRisk of mortalitySurvival analysisSurvival rateSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is frequent and the impact of mild PVL on outcomes remains uncertain. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of PVL on TAVI outcomes. Methods: To analyze late outcomes of patients after TAVI according to the presence and severity of PVL, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched for studies that reported rates of all-cause mortality/survival and/or rehospitalization and/or cardiovascular mortality accompanied by at least one Kaplan-Meier curve for any of these outcomes. We adopted a 2-stage approach to reconstruct individual patient data based on the published Kaplan-Meier graphs. Results: < 0.001) during follow-up. Conclusions: Patients with PVL, even if mild, experience higher risk of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular mortality following TAVI. These findings provide support to the implementation of procedural strategies to prevent any degree of PVL at the time of TAVI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.040
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations94
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructural HeartSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207