Optimization Modeling for Regional Energy System Management Coupled with Energy–Water Nexus and Carbon Emission Reduction: A Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under global climate change and resource crisis, the correlation and restriction between energy, water, and carbon emission are increasingly prominent, which has posed great challenges for the sustainable development of energy systems. This article develops a dual-interval stage-fuzzy credibility-constrained programming model for regional energy system management problems with energy–water nexus (EWN) and carbon emission reduction, in which uncertainties expressed as discrete intervals, probability distributions, and dual-interval fuzzy numbers can be addressed. It can provide a trade-off among economic cost, system risk, and environmental objective. Then, the hybrid programming method is applied to a case of Guangdong Province, China to verify its applicability, where a series of scenarios with respect to water resources and carbon emission constraints are explored and examined. The robust solutions of optimal strategies for electricity generation, capacity expansion, water supply, and carbon capture are investigated and obtained. Results disclose that different scenarios associated with water resource availability and carbon emissions would deeply affect the EWN system planning: (1) Compared with low carbon emission standard, the proportion of renewable power generation under high carbon emission scenario would increase by [1.39, 1.68] %, [1.69, 2.35] %, and [1.49, 1.94] % in periods 1–3, respectively. (2) Scarce water availability scenario would restrict coal-fired power generation and simulate the development of renewable energy. These findings can be useful for decision makers to gain deep insights into energy system management in a sustainable way considering energy structure adjustment, multiple uncertainties, EWN, and carbon emission reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".