MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309399182 · doi:10.33087/ekonomis.v6i2.596

Pengaruh Citra Merek dan Kepercayaan merek terhadap Loyalitas Produk Roma Sari Gandum di Wilayah Gresik

2022· article· en· W4309399182 on OpenAlexaff
Cindy Pramilenia Dewi, Rizky Dermawan

Bibliographic record

VenueEKONOMIS Journal of Economics and Business · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonprobability samplingBrand loyaltyAdvertisingBrand imagePopulationLikert scaleProduct (mathematics)PsychologySample (material)BusinessLoyaltyMarketingMathematicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brand loyalty is a behavior of consumer loyalty to the brand by repurchasing the same product more than once. The purpose of this research is to find out the effect of brand image and brand trust on brand loyalty.This research uses quantitative methods. The questionnaire survey uses a Likert scale with a population and a sample of 90 consumers in the Gresik area. The selection of this research sample is based on purposive sampling. The results of the analysis using the Partial Least Square (PLS) application with validity tests, reliability tests, and hypothesis testing. The results of the study indicate that the brand image has made a high contribution to brand loyalty in Roma Sari wheat products. Brand trust can contribute to brand loyalty in Roma Sari Gandum Products. It means that the better the brand image produced by a product, the higher the brand loyalty. Even if brand trust, the higher the brand trust, the higher the brand loyalty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEKONOMIS Journal of Economics and BusinessSame topicConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceFrench-language works237,207