MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309583437 · doi:10.1002/rsa.21123

Subgraph probability of random graphs with specified degrees and applications to chromatic number and connectivity

2022· article· en· W4309583437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueRandom Structures and Algorithms · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopological and Geometric Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsChromatic scaleRandom graphVertex (graph theory)CombinatoricsMathematical proofDegree (music)Probabilistic logicDiscrete mathematicsJoint probability distributionGraphSet (abstract data type)Upper and lower boundsComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Given a graphical degree sequence , let denote a uniformly random graph on vertex set where vertex has degree for every . We give upper and lower bounds on the joint probability of an arbitrary set of edges in , and we link these probability estimates to the corresponding probabilities in the configuration model. Then we show that many existing results of in the literature can be significantly improved with simpler proofs, by applying this new probabilistic tool. One example we give concerns the chromatic number of . In another application, we use these joint probabilities to study the connectivity of . Under some rather mild condition on —in particular, if where is the maximum component of —we fully characterize the connectivity phase transition of . We also give sufficient conditions for being connected when is unrestricted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it