Jackknife Bias-Corrected Generalized Regression Estimator in Survey Sampling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The generalized regression (GREG) estimator is a well-known procedure for using auxiliary data to estimate means or totals using a sample selected from a finite population. The GREG estimator is motivated by an assumed linear superpopulation model and it is known to be asymptotically unbiased regardless of whether the model is correctly specified or not. When the sample size is small and/or when the linear model does not fit the sample data well, the GREG estimator may have nonnegligible bias. In this article, we use the jackknife procedure to correct the bias of the GREG. We evaluate, both theoretically and by simulation, the performance of the jackknife bias-corrected regression estimator (GREG-JK) under unistage sampling without replacement with unequal probabilities. A jackknife mean squared error (MSE) estimator is proposed that naturally includes a finite population correction, which is usually absent in the standard jackknife methods for variance estimation. A simulation study shows that the empirical bias of GREG-JK is negligible for all sample sizes and generated populations. Furthermore, the proposed jackknife MSE estimator demonstrates improvements over the customary estimator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.042 | 0.051 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it