MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309651059 · doi:10.1038/s42004-022-00774-5

Preprogrammed assembly of supramolecular polymer networks via the controlled disassembly of a metastable rotaxane

2022· article· en· W4309651059 on OpenAlexafffund
Gosuke Washino, Miguel A. Soto, Siad Wolff, Mark J. MacLachlan

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Chemistry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsRotaxaneSupramolecular chemistryPolymerMetastabilityPolymer networkNanotechnologyRing (chemistry)Computer scienceSupramolecular polymersChemistryMoleculeMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In our daily life, some of the most valuable commodities are preprogrammed or preassembled by a manufacturer; the end-user puts together the final product and gathers properties or function as desired. Here, we present a chemical approach to preassembled materials, namely supramolecular polymer networks (SPNs), which wait for an operator’s command to organize autonomously. In this prototypical system, the controlled disassembly of a metastable interlocked molecule (rotaxane) liberates an active species to the medium. This species crosslinks a ring-containing polymer and assembles with a reporting macrocycle to produce colorful SPNs. We demonstrate that by using identical preprogrammed systems, one can access multiple supramolecular polymer networks with different degrees of fluidity (μ* = 2.5 to 624 Pa s-1) and color, all as desired by the end-user.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications ChemistrySame topicSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesFrench-language works237,207