MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309778242 · doi:10.1016/j.idm.2022.11.003

The distribution of COVID-19 mortality

2022· article· en· W4309778242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Disease Modelling · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersGobierno de AragónMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pareto principleStatisticsPareto distribution2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PandemicLogistic regressionMathematicsDistribution (mathematics)Generalized Pareto distributionGeographyEconometricsExtreme value theoryMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We estimate the distribution of COVID-19 mortality (measured as daily deaths) from the start of the pandemic until July 31st, 2022, for six European countries and the USA. We use the Pareto, the stretched exponential, the log-normal and the log-logistic distributions as well as mixtures of the log-normal and log-logistic distributions. The main results are that the Pareto does not describe well the data and that mixture distributions tend to offer a very good fit to the data. We also compute Value-at-Risk measures as well as mortality probabilities with our estimates. We also discuss the implications of our results and findings from the point of view of public health planning and modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it