MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310271259 · doi:10.29173/spectrum147

When God's Not in the Quarrel: The Negative Irony in Lear's Politics of the Common

2022· article· en· W4310271259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicJoseph Conrad and Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIronyTragedy (event)LiteratureAntithesisPoliticsContext (archaeology)MoralityComicsPhilosophyAestheticsArtHistoryLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

William Shakespeare’s King Lear illustrates the importance of Christian ideals in Early Modern England by portraying a pagan kingdom in which those ideals do not exist. Heavily influenced by Christian scriptures (notably the Book of Acts), Shakespeare’s first audiences understood King Lear as an exploration of a godless world which must eventually become dysfunctional. The play can be approached as a study in “negative irony,” the device through which something (in this case, Christian morality) is celebrated through a portrayal of its antithesis (Hunt 30). The system of communal living, common ownership, and personal com-monality described in Acts is not something that Shakespeare portrays as tenable in a non-Christian context. Through this lens, we see that King Lear juxtaposes the highly religious culture of Early Modern England with the imagined tragedy of a culture devoid of the same religion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it