MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310798182 · doi:10.12775/qs.2022.08.04.003

Free time of elderly people in terms of physical activity

2022· article· en· W4310798182 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality in Sport · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Issues in Poland
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLife expectancyIndependence (probability theory)PopulationQuarter (Canadian coin)GerontologyGeriatricsPopulation ageingElderly peopleRehabilitationPsychologyMedicinePsychiatryEnvironmental healthGeographyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gerontological issues will gain more and more recognition, both in the social and medical aspect. The reason for this is the sharp increase in the percentage of the elderly population, which is related to a decline in birth rates on the one hand and an increase in life expectancy on the other. The aging of the population of Europe and Poland is probably the most important health and socio-political challenge in the coming years. In 2050, people aged 60-79 are expected to make up a quarter of the entire population of the European Union. Maintaining the appropriate level of health, independence and independence of the elderly becomes a great challenge. This is not only a public health challenge, but also a huge socio-economic problem. A typical situation in old age is the occurrence of several diseases at the same time. In addition, the situation is complicated by the procedure of a number of degenerative changes affecting almost all systems and functions of the system, deteriorating the possibility of functioning and rehabilitation. Taking up issues related to seniors becomes important for at least several reasons. The most important ones include: the increasing number of elderly people, the widespread cult of a financially efficient and independent person (completely different from the geriatric reality), the need to educate professionals to help or support those in need, and the need for mental changes in society regarding the aging process and old age itself. The aim of this article is to present the problem of leisure time of elderly people from the perspective of physical activity. The starting point for the considerations was the explanation of the concepts of "old age" and "aging". Next, the most important issues concerning human activity in late adulthood are presented and the main assumptions of the theory of activity are presented. Then the concept of free time was defined, the features of free time activity were discussed, and the functions of free time were also indicated. Attention was also paid to the structure of seniors' time budget and the types of free-time activity that dominate among them. Next, the problem of free time of old people is presented in the context of the theory of activity, paying particular attention to the issues related to the activation of seniors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it